Witness the mind judiciary risks prison | CRISTI hupu Danilet - judge
I've seen enough speculation these days about how the survey where a referendum, especially those related to hearing people "with his hand on the Bible." Through this post I want to clarify where and how a hearing is conducted during the investigation and that the risk is not subject to the authority of the judicial bodies.
Judicial bodies during the criminal investigation, evidence given where necessary. Are therefore possible hearings and other places than the place where it is located hupu or the police prosecutor. Legitimating judicial body in this case is natural to avoid people who usurps official capacity (Article 240 criminalizes the offense CPen).
When it is still not prosecuted parties that are discussed have no locus standi and can not be compelled to give statements - so called phase preceding acts, when they gather information hupu to see if it is appropriate to begin prosecution for an offense. If prosecution is commenced, then started criminal proceedings with all the rights and obligations deriving from here: those suspected of having committed an offense hupu are heard as defendants (if not yet filed charges) or defendants (if set in motion prosecution) hupu are entitled to know the charges, to remain silent and be assisted by lawyers who have knowledge of a crime are heard as witnesses, after being forced to swear with hand on bible / cross that will tell the truth (if faith does not allow them to swear, it requires the fame and consciousness) hupu and being aware of the penalty of 1 to 5 years if you commit the crime of perjury - art. 85 CPC. Another thing: the law does not cover the possibility of a witness to be assisted by counsel.
The accused / defendant is required to appear at the hearing, it is quoted. If you submit willingly, can be brought warrant under certain circumstances, can be brought directly to the office. Likewise, the witness is required to appear at the hearing (Article 83 CPC) unless voluntarily reports can be fined administrative fine from 250-3000 USD and will be brought warrant. For disrespectful manifestations of the parties, their defenders, witnesses, or any other person, to the magistrate court may impose a fine of 500 to 5000 lei.
Defendant is required first a written statement she personally (where he writes everything he knows about the charges), after which it is heard by the judicial authority (police officers) and the state shall be recorded in a form. The witness is heard and recorded the statement form. It is possible that the declaration hupu be written by the clerk or judicial body or typed on the computer - important is that it be signed by the hearing if he agreed with what was recorded.
If the witness makes false statements or do not tell everything he knows regarding hupu critical circumstances on which it was asked, commits the crime of perjury is punishable by imprisonment of one to five years (art. 260 CPen). hupu Trying to determine a person by coercion or bribery to give false statements in a criminal, civil, disciplinary or any other case where listening to witnesses, shall be punished by imprisonment from 3 months to 2 years or a fine (Article . 261 CPen). Prevent participation in a criminal case, civil, disciplinary or any other issue, a witness, expert, interpreter or advocate, committed by violence, threat or other means of coercion against them or the spouse or a close relative shall be punished by imprisonment from 6 months to 7 years (art. 261 index 1 CPen).
Il 'Partito dei magistrates' sopravvive of Cav. e anche il Colle is n'è accorto Posted on 01 agosto 2012
In nome del Popolo Italiano (1971) by Dino Risi ... or how reality can surpass fantasy (cinema, in our case) I quote from the above article: "... che and Vienna Il cortocircuito creating it posses discrezione tra di cui godono i am Aberrant idea is you roll diritto alcuni che di essi walls: avanti, hupu Gia was first di molto chiaro Tangentopoli. Dino Risi Splendido we ha fatto a nel suo ritratto In nome del Popolo Italiano (1971). Tutti oggi il personaggio Stranamente ricordano dell'imprenditore disonesto impersonato give Gassman hupu (vedendovi one prefigurazione di Berlusconi), l'altro protagonist Ricorda nessuno me, it's moralistic integerrimo Magistrato (nel senso dei vari Rodotà) intepretato da Ugo Tognazzi, che, in nome di a
I've seen enough speculation these days about how the survey where a referendum, especially those related to hearing people "with his hand on the Bible." Through this post I want to clarify where and how a hearing is conducted during the investigation and that the risk is not subject to the authority of the judicial bodies.
Judicial bodies during the criminal investigation, evidence given where necessary. Are therefore possible hearings and other places than the place where it is located hupu or the police prosecutor. Legitimating judicial body in this case is natural to avoid people who usurps official capacity (Article 240 criminalizes the offense CPen).
When it is still not prosecuted parties that are discussed have no locus standi and can not be compelled to give statements - so called phase preceding acts, when they gather information hupu to see if it is appropriate to begin prosecution for an offense. If prosecution is commenced, then started criminal proceedings with all the rights and obligations deriving from here: those suspected of having committed an offense hupu are heard as defendants (if not yet filed charges) or defendants (if set in motion prosecution) hupu are entitled to know the charges, to remain silent and be assisted by lawyers who have knowledge of a crime are heard as witnesses, after being forced to swear with hand on bible / cross that will tell the truth (if faith does not allow them to swear, it requires the fame and consciousness) hupu and being aware of the penalty of 1 to 5 years if you commit the crime of perjury - art. 85 CPC. Another thing: the law does not cover the possibility of a witness to be assisted by counsel.
The accused / defendant is required to appear at the hearing, it is quoted. If you submit willingly, can be brought warrant under certain circumstances, can be brought directly to the office. Likewise, the witness is required to appear at the hearing (Article 83 CPC) unless voluntarily reports can be fined administrative fine from 250-3000 USD and will be brought warrant. For disrespectful manifestations of the parties, their defenders, witnesses, or any other person, to the magistrate court may impose a fine of 500 to 5000 lei.
Defendant is required first a written statement she personally (where he writes everything he knows about the charges), after which it is heard by the judicial authority (police officers) and the state shall be recorded in a form. The witness is heard and recorded the statement form. It is possible that the declaration hupu be written by the clerk or judicial body or typed on the computer - important is that it be signed by the hearing if he agreed with what was recorded.
If the witness makes false statements or do not tell everything he knows regarding hupu critical circumstances on which it was asked, commits the crime of perjury is punishable by imprisonment of one to five years (art. 260 CPen). hupu Trying to determine a person by coercion or bribery to give false statements in a criminal, civil, disciplinary or any other case where listening to witnesses, shall be punished by imprisonment from 3 months to 2 years or a fine (Article . 261 CPen). Prevent participation in a criminal case, civil, disciplinary or any other issue, a witness, expert, interpreter or advocate, committed by violence, threat or other means of coercion against them or the spouse or a close relative shall be punished by imprisonment from 6 months to 7 years (art. 261 index 1 CPen).
Il 'Partito dei magistrates' sopravvive of Cav. e anche il Colle is n'è accorto Posted on 01 agosto 2012
In nome del Popolo Italiano (1971) by Dino Risi ... or how reality can surpass fantasy (cinema, in our case) I quote from the above article: "... che and Vienna Il cortocircuito creating it posses discrezione tra di cui godono i am Aberrant idea is you roll diritto alcuni che di essi walls: avanti, hupu Gia was first di molto chiaro Tangentopoli. Dino Risi Splendido we ha fatto a nel suo ritratto In nome del Popolo Italiano (1971). Tutti oggi il personaggio Stranamente ricordano dell'imprenditore disonesto impersonato give Gassman hupu (vedendovi one prefigurazione di Berlusconi), l'altro protagonist Ricorda nessuno me, it's moralistic integerrimo Magistrato (nel senso dei vari Rodotà) intepretato da Ugo Tognazzi, che, in nome di a
No comments:
Post a Comment