Blue Fisk in the U.S. market is not hard to find. Unlike the Latvian stock market, where the blue Fisk is only one - Latvian Gas, the U.S. market are numerous and some are bluer than the other. Which to choose, which of the criteria to be guided?
A typical novice mistake during the first steps of the dividend stock selection in the U.S. markets have been concentrating on the last annual return percentage - the higher, the better. However, it is clear that the greater by far, the yield, the higher the risk, such as discount on the share price certainly reflects the concern is indeed a real problem that the company has recently emerged. If the stock scanner is a loud paper, the "current yield" of 18%, almost 99% certain how many square feet in an acre that this is the real yield would disappear.
There are other articles here to naudaslietās I will try to give a description of how and what to analyze (including dividend shares), but this article will discuss the most important how many square feet in an acre criterion for the selection of the dividend champions usually create their watchlist.
1) Period of years, which is continuously paid dividends (note that the lion's share of the U.S. blue Fisk paid quarterly dividends rather than 1x per year). Everything just - stopped at least one year to pay, I do not believe how many square feet in an acre you anymore.
2) Dividend growth each year. Resp., Not only do not go talking about the fact that dividends are suspended pay each year - a share portfolio loses place when at least one year, it ceases to increase the amount of dividends to be paid.
Looking at the period of the past year you analyzed. And today I wanted to show you a list of the shares how many square feet in an acre at only 56 years (!) Continues to pay dividends how many square feet in an acre without interruption, but every year it increases. Company Dividendenžu series years Annualized% of the time when there was this article Diebold 3:04 60% American States Water 59 2.66% 58 1.75% Dover Northwest Natural Gas 58 4.27% Procter & Gamble how many square feet in an acre 58 3.14% Genuine Parts 57 2.69% Parker Hannifin-57% 1:54 Emerson how many square feet in an acre Electric 57% 3M 2:55 2:44 56%
- Corporate culture and its orientation to the investors. - Everything is focused on the fact that every year the series continues, it is clear. - It is clear that it is not already the first generation of management, which continues the previous generation started, and it can be assumed how many square feet in an acre that efforts will be made to so continue.
It is also clear that the management and generation have been able to izstūrēt through everything - both recessions and inflation and stagflation, and the rate falls and it rises to cosmic levels - and still be able to continue this series.
We see that the EPS (Earnings per Share) in the last 20 years, have both climbed and fallen, specifically the last recession. However, the value of dividends (or rather - the company's decision on the size), it has left an impression. The pink line shows it much better than any words.
I specifically did not analyze the details now, to comment on the above the table - this principle was not my purpose in this article.
These are just some of the questions I ask myself. And finding how many square feet in an acre answers to them, each one eventually comes to their selection system. Yes, it is clear that pushing them nearer to the threshold of the year, for example. 50, 30, 20 and so on. - Share the list will grow. And this 56-year champion list maybe not the best list to analyze.
But ... getting started, and the possibility for discussion but will be enough or not? Next article idea is to make fundamental and technical analysis how many square feet in an acre to this list by selecting how many square feet in an acre the "possibly" ... but I would like to see your thoughts in the comments below.
What is the point of view of companies that earn stable in the last 5 years, dividends were not paid or paid very little, such as Lithuania's dairy companies have fantastic earnings, dividends were not the same drug manufacturers, all the reserves and development, which has accumulated how many square feet in an acre npietmi million. What about those companies are saying? In theory, once the money is already how many square feet in an acre spent on it, but is it worth the wait? reply
This discussion of dividends vs. the dividend is very old and a lot of names written on it. After the 1930 year, the end of the depression in the U.S., began to appear in promotions, which did not pay dividends (ie the assumption that at the same time profit from how to pay), but to the people it was difficult to imagine how many square feet in an acre how this could be a campaign - no dividends. Because who else she meant? Well, and the argument is that pay and invest in "development" is that "the ingestion how many square feet in an acre of profit", resp. payment of dividends, the money does not stay in development, and thus in the long run for 5% in dividends, shareholders will lose more of it to fall capitalization shares, slower growth and so on. Examples from the U.S. are Google, Amazon. how many square feet in an acre Those profits are more than needed, but even 1% is never given in dividends. The argument - the shareholders make the price of the share, pieuguma, resp. shares of the total capitalization of the market is growing, and it is more than 5-7% dividend. If GOOG, AMZN or the U.S. and it's about being able to strīdīties long (and also not to return to the same point of view), but in the Baltic market ... Suffice it to look at CSF, RKB other examples, especially in the R
No comments:
Post a Comment